The Nvidia GeForce MX350 is a dedicated entry-level mobile graphics card for laptops. It was released in February 2020 and is based on the same GP107 Pascal chip with 640 shaders as the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 for laptops. The memory bus is cut in half to 64 bit (GDDR5).
First benchmarks however show a bit slower performance as the GTX 1050 and on par with a GTX 960M. Nvidia states on the product page that the MX350 offers 2.5x of the performance of a Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 in an i7-1065G7 (vs 2x for the MX330). Therefore, demanding games of 2019 like The Division 2, Metro Exodus or Rage 2 will only run in lowest detail settings acceptable. Less demanding games like Fifa 20 should run fine in high settings and even 1080p. However, this is always also depending on the used processor and main memory. See below for detailed gaming benchmarks.
The GP107-670-A1 chip is manufactured in a 14 nm FinFET process at Samsung and offers a number of new features, including support for DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) as well as improved H.265 video de- and encoding (PlayReady 3.0). A full list of improvements and the new Pascal desktop GPUs is available in our dedicated Pascal architecture article.
In new Nvidia drivers drivers the GeForce MX350 appeared with the hardware ID 1C94.
The power consumption in our tests was lower than the average GTX 1050 (even Max-Q) and similar to the older MX graphics cards (as the TGP of 25 Watt suggests). Therefore, the GPU is suited for thin and light laptops.
GeForce MX300 Series |
|
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Architecture | Pascal |
| Pipelines | 640 – unified |
| TMUs | 40 |
| ROPs | 16 |
| Core Speed | 1354 – 1468 (Boost) MHz |
| Memory Speed | 7000 effective = 1752 MHz |
| Memory Bus Width | 64 Bit |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| Shared Memory | no |
| Memory Bandwidth | 56.1 GB/s |
| API | DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 |
| Power Consumption | 25 Watt |
| Transistor Count | 3.3 Billion |
| Die Size | 132 mm² |
| technology | 14 nm |
| PCIe | 3.0 |
| Displays | HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| Features | Vulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, PCIe 3.0, GameWorks |
| Date of Announcement | 20.02.2020 |
| Link to Manufacturer Page | https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/gam… |
Benchmarks
Performance Rating – 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1219 avg: 1465 median: 1491 (5%) max: 1752 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1123 avg: 1322 median: 1335.5 (4%) max: 1595 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 77510 avg: 229394 median: 285166 (33%) max: 306423 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 67621 avg: 77658 median: 79699 (11%) max: 85655 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11700 avg: 15613 median: 16226 (18%) max: 18419 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 23194 avg: 24858 median: 24744 (8%) max: 26239 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3615 avg: 3975 median: 3985 (7%) max: 4196 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3999 avg: 4390 median: 4371 (6%) max: 4656 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 80101 avg: 88743 median: 87118 (11%) max: 97898 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 9538 avg: 9739 median: 9837 (5%) max: 9841 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Night Raid
min: 13630 avg: 13846 median: 13845.5 (14%) max: 14061 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 17617 avg: 17916 median: 17916 (7%) max: 18215 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5099 avg: 6325 median: 6376 (9%) max: 6781 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5191 avg: 6142 median: 6166 (6%) max: 6540 Points
Power Consumption – The Witcher 3 Power Consumption – external Monitor *
min: 45 avg: 49.2 median: 50.1 (7%) max: 51.5 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 46 avg: 53 median: 54 (12%) max: 59 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.278 avg: 0.3 median: 0.3 (41%) max: 0.3326 Points per Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency – external Monitor
min: 0.2834 avg: 0.3 median: 0.3 (0%) max: 0.3333 Points per Watt
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1314 avg: 1404 median: 1403.5 (70%) max: 1493 MHz
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 987 avg: 1164 median: 1164 (46%) max: 1341 MHz
– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
– Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920×1080
low 1366×768
med. 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920×1080
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920×1080
Lowest Settings possible 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 09. 23:41:57
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:10:53 +0100 +0.001s … 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.058s … 0.059s
#4 did output specs +0s … 0.059s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.059s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9980 +0.029s … 0.088s
#7 got single benchmarks 9980 +0.052s … 0.14s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.14s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.558s … 0.698s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.698s
#11 Got 629 rows for game benchmarks. +0.061s … 0.759s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.759s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.045s … 0.804s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.618s … 2.422s
#15 return log +0.055s … 2.476s
