Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S smartphone Light, cheap with OLED screen

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S smartphone Light, cheap with OLED screen

Slim and slender. The Redmi Note 12S is a compact smartphone with its 6.43-inch screen. It offers a lot of storage and a high-resolution main camera, but you won’t find 5G. In our review, we take a look at how well the compact mid-range smartphone scores.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Jacob Fisher), Published 🇩🇪

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S

Smartphones with screens just under the 7-inch limit are no longer a rarity, but there are certainly people for whom a compact smartphone is more practical. It fits better in the pocket, is easier to use in small hands and is often lighter.

The Redmi Note 12S is Xiaomi’s new and slightly smaller model in its cheap mid-range series. But this doesn’t mean that you have to do without an AMOLED screen and decent storage space.

Display

6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 

, 235 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n=Wi-Fi 4/ac=Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 159.9 x 73.9 (=0.32 x 6.3 x 2.91 in)

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33-watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.9, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, Videos @1080p/​30fps

Additional features

Speakers: hybrid stereo speakers, 24 Months Warranty, FM Radio, fanless

Weight

176 g (= 6.21 oz / 0.39 pounds) (= 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Rating

Date

Model

Weight

Drive

Size

Resolution

Best Price

80.4 %

08/2023

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2
176 g 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash 6.43″ 2400×1080
78.5 %

06/2023

Honor X8a
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
179 g 128 GB eMMC Flash 6.70″ 2388×1080
81.7 %

06/2023

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619
189 g 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash 6.67″ 2400×1080
79.1 %

03/2023

Motorola Moto G53
SD 480+, Adreno 619
183 g 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash 6.50″ 1600×720
79.4 %

05/2023

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
202 g 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash 6.60″ 2408×1080

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S is quite a light smartphone at 176 grams and significantly smaller than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G, for example. However, the bezels around the screen are clearly visible, so the phone could have been even more compact with some tweaking.

The case is made of plastic; the back shimmers in either Pearl Green, Ice Blue or Onyx Black. The camera module protrudes clearly from the case and stands out due to its dark color. Despite its simple plastic frame, the smartphone is very stable and can hardly be twisted. The back can be dented slightly in some places.

A protection standard has not been specified, so the Redmi Note 12S should not be exposed to dusty environments or submerged in water.

{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335717’).checked=false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_337663’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_337663’).checked=false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_335409’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335409’).checked=false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_337357’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_337357’).checked=false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_338854’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_338854’).checked=false;return false;” title=”hide all”>❌

167.7 mm / 6.6 inch78 mm / 3.07 inch9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch202 g0.4453 lbs165.9 mm / 6.53 inch76.2 mm / 3 inch8 mm / 0.315 inch189 g0.4167 lbs162.7 mm / 6.41 inch74.7 mm / 2.94 inch8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch183 g0.4034 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 inch74.5 mm / 2.93 inch7.5 mm / 0.2953 inch179 g0.3946 lbs159.9 mm / 6.3 inch73.9 mm / 2.91 inch8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch176 g0.388 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch105 mm / 4.13 inch1 mm / 0.03937 inch1.5 g0.00331 lbs

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S comes in two configurations, of which the availability depends on location. The same also applies to price.

  • 128 GB mass storage / 6 GB RAM 
  • 256 GB mass storage / 8 GB RAM

An unusual feature is the FM radio capability. This is handy in the absence of network coverage or if you don’t want to use any mobile data. An infrared port also allows for the linking of remote control devices.

NFC is also on board so that mobile payment services can be used.

The microSD slot is also the smartphone’s second SIM slot, so you have to decide whether you would rather use 2 SIM cards or one SIM and the microSD for more storage.

In testing with our Angelbird V60 reference card, read rates are quite slow. The CPDT benchmark reveals repeated drops in the data rate, so the card reader should only be used for data that is used less often.

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.6 (15.6-48.3)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.3 (4.86-48.5)

Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.9 (28.3-49.6)

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (22.3-48.4)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.3 (44.9-85.2)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø61.2 (29.9-79.8)

Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.1 (26.1-84.4)

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.7 (20.1-83.4)

Android 13 is preinstalled on the smartphone. On top of this is in-house MiUI 14, which changes the system significantly and sometimes displays advertising when using system apps. Numerous third-party apps are also preinstalled, which can be simply deleted if desired.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S is not part of the “Android Enterprise Recommended” program, which provides information about update frequency and duration. Hence, it is difficult to obtain information about the expected supply of updates and software for the smartphone.

The Redmi Note 11S predecessor, which started with Android 11, will receive Android 13. Therefore, major version updates are also expected for the Redmi Note 12S 2. The security patches were from July 2023 and thus reasonably up to date at the time of review. In the low price range, Xiaomi usually provides security updates every 3 months.

Thanks to WiFi 5, the Redmi Note 12S achieves data rates of up to 388 Mbit/s with our Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router. So the smartphone is on the usual level for this price range, but we also observed one or two significant drops in the data rate during testing. These occur at irregular intervals when the test is repeated several times.

The smartphone displays full signal strength close to the router and websites are loaded quite quickly. At a distance of 10 meters and through 3 walls, the signal strength remains unchanged, but pages load noticeably slower.

The Redmi Note 12S is a 4G smartphone. It offers the most necessary frequencies for domestic use, but you’ll have to inquire further whether you can use mobile internet when traveling abroad. During our approximately 2-week review phase, we repeatedly checked the signal and compared it with high-end smartphones in the same network at the same place. The Xiaomi smartphone is on a medium level here and usually cannot keep up the signal strength of more expensive smartphones, but never completely loses reception in an inner-city environment

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 – 1875, n=183, last 2 years)





634 MBit/s ∼100% +98%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash





369 (361min – 371max) MBit/s ∼58% +15%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash





347 (336min – 351max) MBit/s ∼55% +8%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash





345 (317min – 350max) MBit/s ∼54% +8%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash





333 (276min – 345max) MBit/s ∼53% +4%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash





320 (241min – 354max) MBit/s ∼50%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 – 1810, n=184, last 2 years)





668 MBit/s ∼100% +82%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash





369 (337min – 380max) MBit/s ∼55% 0%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash





368 (326min – 388max) MBit/s ∼55%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash





367 (351min – 384max) MBit/s ∼55% 0%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash





363 (349min – 374max) MBit/s ∼54% -1%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash





358 (319min – 374max) MBit/s ∼54% -3%

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip

The Redmi smartphone works with all major satellite networks for localization. SBAS is also supported for more precise positioning. When we step outdoors, it takes a short while before we are positioned accurately to a good 5 meters.

As for its real-world capabilities, we took the Redmi Note 12 on a bike ride, taking the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch along for comparison.

The Xiaomi smartphone’s navigation capabilities prove to be limited, even on fairly open terrain. Again and again, we see clear deviations from the route and the loop recorded is clearly too small. 

These inaccuracies also persist in the narrow streets of the old town and over the bridge. According to the Redmi Note 12, we passed through houses and hovered over the water. Even in this price range there are smartphones that track the user much more precisely.

Xiaomi uses Google’s standard app for telephony.

The voice quality is loud and clear via the integrated earpiece, so that you can understand the other person well, even in noisy surroundings. The microphone also picks up our voice clearly, but there are small dropouts from time to time.

The sound quality is significantly weaker via the speaker and hands-free mode, so that the person on the other end sounds further away and is harder to understand. But our voice is conveyed in a way that is easy to understand, according to the other party.

Photo with the front camera
Photo with the front camera

The main camera in the Redmi Note 12S has a resolution of 108 megapixels, and Samsung’s Isocell HM2 is used as the sensor. It combines 9 pixels into one large pixel and thus shoots 12-megapixel images with good light sensitivity. Full resolution can only be used in a special mode.

The resulting photos are rather cool in terms of white balance, but this contributes to realistic reproduction. At first glance, the images look sharp, but details become lost when enlarged. The dynamics are satisfactory in daylight, but decrease in weak lighting and show clear weaknesses in both dark and bright areas.

The wide-angle camera has a resolution of 8 megapixels and you can use a hybrid zoom with focal lengths between the two lenses in normal photo mode. The camera takes decent pictures, but you shouldn’t zoom in for detail. The third lens on the back is a low-resolution macro camera that can only be used in a special mode.

On the front is a 16-megapixel Sony camera. It takes solid selfies in good light, but there is little in the way of dynamics, and details look very grainy when zoomed in.

Samsung’s main camera still has to prove itself in the test lab. Here we have a test chart that we photograph in full studio lighting. The sharpness clearly decreases at the edges of the picture, and black text in front of a red background also poses sharpness problems for the camera.

At only 1 lux illuminance, the image is still recognizable, but with very little detail.

ColorChecker

8.3 ∆E

5.7 ∆E

13.2 ∆E

13.1 ∆E

12.4 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

4.3 ∆E

13.7 ∆E

6.5 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

5.1 ∆E

4.8 ∆E

9 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

11.2 ∆E

0.8 ∆E

8.5 ∆E

13.7 ∆E

7.2 ∆E

6.5 ∆E

7.2 ∆E

11.4 ∆E

14.9 ∆E

11.9 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S: 8.8 ∆E min: 0.85 – max: 14.9 ∆E
ColorChecker

29.6 ∆E

51.6 ∆E

39.3 ∆E

34.8 ∆E

44.7 ∆E

56.7 ∆E

51.3 ∆E

36.1 ∆E

39.2 ∆E

29 ∆E

58.5 ∆E

58.8 ∆E

31.5 ∆E

45.4 ∆E

35.6 ∆E

69.3 ∆E

40.2 ∆E

41.2 ∆E

75.1 ∆E

67.2 ∆E

49.6 ∆E

35.9 ∆E

23.9 ∆E

13.9 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S: 44.1 ∆E min: 13.91 – max: 75.14 ∆E

In addition to the charger and a USB cable, the package also contains a silicone case for the smartphone and a tool for opening the SIM tray. However, you won’t find a wired headset, which is absolutely necessary if you want to use the FM radio since it serves as an antenna replacement.

Xiaomi offers a 24-month warranty on smartphones purchased in the EU (this may differ in regions outside the EU). Another bonus is that the battery and the power adapter are also covered by a full 2-year warranty.

Since the screen can display up to 90 frames per second, operation feels very responsive. The accurate touchscreen also contributes to this and accepts our commands without issue right up to the corners.

The fingerprint sensor is integrated in the standby button on the right. It reacts quickly and reliably to fingerprints that have been registered and unlocks the smartphone with minimal delay. Facial recognition is also available on the Redmi Note 12S. However, this only works with 2D images and is therefore susceptible to manipulation.

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

An AMOLED screen is rarely found in this price range (just above US$200), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S has one. It has enhanced FullHD resolution and a frame rate of up to 90 Hz.

The brightness is also on a high level, even if we only measured an average of 631 cd/m² and not the 700 cd/m² advertised by Xiaomi. We measured over 900 cd/m² in small areas (APL 18), so the display is also be reasonably suitable for HDR content, even if it is not advertised as such.

Since the black value on AMOLED screens is almost perfect due to the pixels that can be switched off, this makes for strong contrasts and vivid colors on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S.

638
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
643
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
627
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 643 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 631.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 627 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.15 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.284

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
AMOLED, 2400×1080, 6.43
Honor X8a
IPS, 2388×1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
AMOLED, 2400×1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G53
IPS, 1600×720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
PLS LCD, 2408×1080, 6.60
Screen

-27%

-11%

-77%

-272%

Brightness middle

627

492

-22%

658

5%

587

-6%

579

-8%

Brightness

631

481

-24%

663

5%

559

-11%

543

-14%

Brightness Distribution

97

94

-3%

98

1%

91

-6%

87

-10%

Black Level *

0.38

0.4

0.57

Colorchecker dE 2000 *

1.15

1.32

-15%

1.4

-22%

2.6

-126%

7.6

-561%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

2.05

3.37

-64%

2.7

-32%

5.62

-174%

12.7

-520%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

1.4

1.9

-36%

1.7

-21%

3.3

-136%

8.7

-521%

Gamma

2.284 96%

2.194 100%

2.23 99%

2.463 89%

2.23 99%

CCT

6347 102%

6288 103%

6504 100%

6288 103%

9344 70%

Contrast

1295

1468

1016

* … smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 355.6 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 355.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 355.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19003 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Series of measurements at a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

Annoyingly, the screen exhibits clear PWM flickering at 50% brightness and below, which fluctuates between 120 and 356 Hz. Since a DC dimming option is lacking, sensitive individuals are likely to have issues here. So you should definitely test the screen at low brightness before buying.

Color reproduction is very good in the “Standard” profile and deviates only minimally from the reference values.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

   ↔    Response Time Black to White
2.1 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 1.4 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.7 ms).

Outdoors, the bright display proves to be easy to read, even on bright summer days.

The viewing angles are also very wide from all directions thanks to AMOLED.

MediaTek’s Helio G96 is used as the processor in the Redmi Note 12S. It has a few years under its belt and was already used in the Redmi Note 11S predecessor. Nevertheless, the current Redmi smartphone still proves to be powerful and is able to rank in the midfield among the comparison devices.

In everyday use you’ll have to deal with the fact that the system stutters from time to time, but overall you can work well. You’ll also have to live with slightly longer waiting times when starting more complex apps, but the Helio G96 proves to be sufficient for many tasks overall.

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 – 1885, n=240, last 2 years)





830 Points ∼100% +57%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


642 Points ∼77% +21%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


558 Points ∼67% +5%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


530 Points ∼64%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


525 Points ∼63% -1%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (466 – 530, n=3)





508 Points ∼61% -4%

Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144


284 Points ∼34% -46%

Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 – 5538, n=240, last 2 years)





2670 Points ∼100% +52%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


1954 Points ∼73% +11%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (1688 – 1863, n=3)





1769 Points ∼66% +1%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


1755 Points ∼66%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


1700 Points ∼64% -3%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


1632 Points ∼61% -7%

Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144


1132 Points ∼42% -35%

Geekbench 6.1
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 – 2021, n=19, last 2 years)





1042 Points ∼100% +53%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


680 Points ∼65%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
 





680 Points ∼65% 0%

Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144


438 Points ∼42% -36%

Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 – 5496, n=19, last 2 years)





2752 Points ∼100% +63%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


1688 Points ∼61%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
 





1688 Points ∼61% 0%

Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144


1217 Points ∼44% -28%

Antutu v9 – Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 – 1322448, n=164, last 2 years)





671519 Points ∼100% +85%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


363022 Points ∼54%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (297002 – 363022, n=2)





330012 Points ∼49% -9%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


317725 Points ∼47% -12%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


308581 Points ∼46% -15%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


Points ∼0% -100%

PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 – 28378, n=228, last 2 years)





10817 Points ∼100% +30%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


10093 Points ∼93% +22%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (8115 – 9209, n=3)





8540 Points ∼79% +3%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


8297 Points ∼77%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


8038 Points ∼74% -3%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


7953 Points ∼74% -4%

Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144


6789 Points ∼63% -18%

CrossMark – Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 – 1356, n=144, last 2 years)





788 Points ∼100% +52%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


546 Points ∼69% +5%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


539 Points ∼68% +4%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


534 Points ∼68% +3%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


518 Points ∼66%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (440 – 518, n=2)





479 Points ∼61% -8%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 – 9679, n=165, last 2 years)





5213 Points ∼100% +70%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


3337 Points ∼64% +9%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


3236 Points ∼62% +5%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


3072 Points ∼59%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (2696 – 3072, n=2)





2884 Points ∼55% -6%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


2825 Points ∼54% -8%

System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 – 19657, n=165, last 2 years)





8988 Points ∼100% +58%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


6437 Points ∼72% +13%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


6157 Points ∼69% +8%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


5684 Points ∼63%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


5508 Points ∼61% -3%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (5016 – 5684, n=2)





5350 Points ∼60% -6%

Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 – 11617, n=165, last 2 years)





5705 Points ∼100% +33%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


4282 Points ∼75%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


4065 Points ∼71% -5%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


3991 Points ∼70% -7%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


3782 Points ∼66% -12%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (3280 – 4282, n=2)





3781 Points ∼66% -12%

Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 – 30125, n=165, last 2 years)





11512 Points ∼100% +332%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


4001 Points ∼35% +50%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


2876 Points ∼25% +8%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (2666 – 2763, n=2)





2715 Points ∼24% +2%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


2676 Points ∼23% 0%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


2666 Points ∼23%

Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 – 2392, n=165, last 2 years)





1456 Points ∼100% +6%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


1372 Points ∼94%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (1163 – 1372, n=2)





1268 Points ∼87% -8%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


1263 Points ∼87% -8%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


1184 Points ∼81% -14%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


1083 Points ∼74% -21%

UL Procyon AI Inference – Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 – 84787, n=120, last 2 years)





22929 Points ∼100% +144%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


9380 Points ∼41%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (9119 – 9380, n=2)





9250 Points ∼40% -1%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


6303 Points ∼27% -33%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


5395 Points ∼24% -42%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


5242 Points ∼23% -44%

AImark – Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 – 128240, n=57, last 2 years)





13690 Points ∼100% +1528%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096


949 Points ∼7% +13%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192


841 Points ∼6%

Average Mediatek Helio G96
 





841 Points ∼6% 0%

Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


424 Points ∼3% -50%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144


Points ∼0% -100%

The mobile graphics chip in the Redmi Note 12S cannot render 4K graphics in games smoothly, but neither can any other smartphone in this price range. Even in Full HD graphics, you have to run less complex games for a smooth gaming experience. The Redmi Note 12 5G, for example, is much more powerful here.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


326 Points ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


310 Points ∼95% -5%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


287 Points ∼88% -12%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


156 Points ∼48% -52%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


Points ∼0% -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


324 Points ∼100% +2%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


317 Points ∼98%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


293 Points ∼90% -8%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


188 Points ∼58% -41%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


Points ∼0% -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


1139 Points ∼100% 0%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


1139 Points ∼100%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


973 Points ∼85% -15%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


622 Points ∼55% -45%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


Points ∼0% -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


1191 Points ∼100% +3%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


1160 Points ∼97%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


982 Points ∼82% -15%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


697 Points ∼59% -40%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


Points ∼0% -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


3618 Points ∼100% +14%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


3387 Points ∼94% +7%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


3231 Points ∼89% +2%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


3174 Points ∼88%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


2478 Points ∼68% -22%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2590 Points ∼100% +15%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


2412 Points ∼93% +7%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2347 Points ∼91% +5%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2244 Points ∼87%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


1231 Points ∼48% -45%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2709 Points ∼100% +13%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


2638 Points ∼97% +10%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2546 Points ∼94% +6%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2400 Points ∼89%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


1386 Points ∼51% -42%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


103 fps ∼100% +106%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


58 fps ∼56% +16%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


56 fps ∼54% +12%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


50 fps ∼49%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


34 fps ∼33% -32%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


85 fps ∼100% +49%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


81 fps ∼95% +42%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


64 fps ∼75% +12%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


57 fps ∼67%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


38 fps ∼45% -33%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


68 fps ∼100% +127%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


36 fps ∼53% +20%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


30 fps ∼44%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


27 fps ∼40% -10%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


19 fps ∼28% -37%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


43 fps ∼100% +23%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


41 fps ∼95% +17%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


36 fps ∼84% +3%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


35 fps ∼81%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


21 fps ∼49% -40%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


55 fps ∼100% +175%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


25 fps ∼45% +25%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


21 fps ∼38% +5%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


20 fps ∼36%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


13 fps ∼24% -35%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


31 fps ∼100% +41%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


29 fps ∼94% +32%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


24 fps ∼77% +9%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


22 fps ∼71%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


13 fps ∼42% -41%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


29 fps ∼100% +164%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


15 fps ∼52% +36%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


12 fps ∼41% +9%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


11 fps ∼38%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


7.4 fps ∼26% -33%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


17 fps ∼100% +31%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


17 fps ∼100% +31%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


15 fps ∼88% +15%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


13 fps ∼76%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


8.7 fps ∼51% -33%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


20 fps ∼100% +141%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


11 fps ∼55% +33%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


8.3 fps ∼42%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


7.9 fps ∼40% -5%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


4.8 fps ∼24% -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


8.9 fps ∼100% +62%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


7.1 fps ∼80% +29%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


5.5 fps ∼62%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


5.3 fps ∼60% -4%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


3.2 fps ∼36% -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


31 fps ∼100% +138%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


17 fps ∼55% +31%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


13 fps ∼42%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


12 fps ∼39% -8%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


7.5 fps ∼24% -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


20 fps ∼100% +43%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


18 fps ∼90% +29%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


14 fps ∼70% 0%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


14 fps ∼70%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


8.2 fps ∼41% -41%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


3.1 fps ∼100% +55%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


2.9 fps ∼94% +45%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2.3 fps ∼74% +15%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2 fps ∼65%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


1.5 fps ∼48% -25%

For internet surfing, the Redmi Note 12S is not a bad choice for its price range. It is usually faster than comparable smartphones in the browser benchmarks, and websites load reasonably quickly in everyday use. However, you often have to wait a bit for pictures.

Jetstream 2 – Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (17.3 – 282, n=168, last 2 years)





88.9 Points ∼100% +43%

Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)


69.475 Points ∼78% +12%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)


62.192 Points ∼70%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)


58.044 Points ∼65% -7%

Average Mediatek Helio G96 (42.5 – 62.2, n=2)





52.4 Points ∼59% -16%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)


48.955 Points ∼55% -21%

Speedometer 2.0 – Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.4 – 375, n=156, last 2 years)





83.3 runs/min ∼100% +58%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)


52.7 runs/min ∼63%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)


48.5 runs/min ∼58% -8%

Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)


47.78 runs/min ∼57% -9%

Average Mediatek Helio G96 (34.4 – 52.7, n=2)





43.6 runs/min ∼52% -17%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)


34.4 runs/min ∼41% -35%

WebXPRT 4 – Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (25 – 202, n=103, last 2 years)





91.6 Points ∼100% +58%

Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)


77 Points ∼84% +33%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)


68 Points ∼74% +17%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)


58 Points ∼63%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (2111)


50 Points ∼55% -14%

Average Mediatek Helio G96 (42 – 58, n=2)





50 Points ∼55% -14%

Octane V2 – Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 – 74261, n=200, last 2 years)





30005 Points ∼100% +51%

Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)


20938 Points ∼70% +5%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)


19873 Points ∼66%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)


19867 Points ∼66% 0%

Average Mediatek Helio G96 (17394 – 19873, n=2)





18634 Points ∼62% -6%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)


15352 Points ∼51% -23%

Honor X8a (Chrome 114)


9404 Points ∼31% -53%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 – Total Score
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2560 – 2773, n=2)





2667 ms * ∼100% -4%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)


2560.2 ms * ∼96%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)


2337.2 ms * ∼88% +9%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)


2117.2 ms * ∼79% +17%

Average of class Smartphone (414 – 9999, n=170, last 2 years)





1904 ms * ∼71% +26%

Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)


1829.3 ms * ∼69% +29%

* … smaller is better

The Redmi Note 12S offers quite fast storage in the form of UFS 2.2. Together with a correspondingly fast memory controller, however, this kind of storage can do much more, as the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G shows. Even so, the Redmi Note 12S offers fast data transfers and relatively short loading times for its price range.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Honor X8a Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Motorola Moto G53 Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5

-66%

-9%

-28%

13%

38%

50%

Sequential Read 256KB

518.7

278.1

-46%

520.09

0%

474.6

-9%

849.3

64%

905 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(514 – 1009, n=12)

74%

1195 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(215 – 4512, n=234, last 2 years)

130%

Sequential Write 256KB

492.3

224.2

-54%

505.55

3%

243.87

-50%

469.83

-5%

741 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(369 – 913, n=12)

51%

778 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(57.5 – 3062, n=234, last 2 years)

58%

Random Read 4KB

211.9

61.6

-71%

170.61

-19%

166.24

-22%

193.63

-9%

235 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(193.4 – 291, n=12)

11%

211 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(22.2 – 543, n=234, last 2 years)

0%

Random Write 4KB

202.6

18.7

-91%

161.26

-20%

139.83

-31%

204

1%

238 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(175.1 – 301, n=12)

17%

222 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(13 – 572, n=235, last 2 years)

10%

60 fps in games are rarely achieved with the Redmi Note 12S. Although possible in the fast 2D shooter Armajet, there are occasional frame rate fluctuations here as well.

At very low settings in PUBG Mobile, we see up to 40 fps, otherwise 30 fps is the norm. Frame rates were measured with GameBench.

The controls via touchscreen and position sensor work very well.

051015202530354045505560Tooltip

At a maximum of 42.2 °C, the smartphone gets very warm under prolonged load, but doesn’t reach critical temperatures and can always be held without issue. Performance also remains quite constant under longer loads. We measured a maximum performance drop of 8% after 20 runs of the same benchmark.

  42.2 °C
108 F
36.7 °C
98 F
33.8 °C
93 F
 
  41.2 °C
106 F
36.3 °C
97 F
33.7 °C
93 F
 
  40.8 °C
105 F
36.3 °C
97 F
33.8 °C
93 F
 
Maximum: 42.2 °C=108 F
Average: 37.2 °C=99 F
35.2 °C
95 F
36.8 °C
98 F
40.6 °C
105 F
34.4 °C
94 F
37 °C
99 F
42.1 °C
108 F
32.8 °C
91 F
37.1 °C
99 F
40.3 °C
105 F
Maximum: 42.1 °C=108 F
Average: 37.4 °C=99 F

Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C=108 F | Room Temperature 21.3 °C=70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


99.5 % ∼100% +9%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


96.9 % ∼97% +6%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


91.7 % ∼92%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


83 % ∼83% -9%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


% ∼0% -100%

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


99 % ∼100%

Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


98.8 % ∼100% 0%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


98.4 % ∼99% -1%

Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash


81.8 % ∼83% -17%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


% ∼0% -100%

01234567Tooltip

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.956 (1.948-1.968)

Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.011 (0.932-1.14)

Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.755 (1.744-1.766)

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.978 (1.957-1.988)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.91 (6.4-6.98)

Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.9 (3.73-4.49)

Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø5.87 (5.72-5.9)

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.2 (7.18-7.21)

The speaker system, consisting of the main speaker on the bottom edge and the earpiece as the second speaker, produces slight stereo effects when you hold the phone sideways and reproduces voices quite clearly. As soon as instruments are added, however, the two speakers seem a little overwhelmed and become imprecise. The sound is also quite high-pitched, but is rarely uncomfortable, even at maximum volume.

Things sound better when using the audio port or Bluetooth for external audio devices. Also great is the fact that Xiaomi provides many codecs for wireless audio transmission, including SBC, AAC, the most important aptX codecs, LDAC and LHDC up to version 5.

dB(A)0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.1372537.537.73131.429.64033.333.45032.132.66326.126.78020.219.710016.116.612514.917.21601329.62009.535.325010.541.331511.948.64008.154.3500959.163010.260.680013.963.7100012.264125011.866.7160011.470.7200010.671.7250011.372.231501271400012.773.2500013.468.6630014.161.9800014.864.21000015.768.51250016.464.51600017.354.3SPL24.981.3N0.646.4median 12.2median 63.7Delta1.911.529.635.63031.224.530.625.833.237.536.825.232.820.236.620.436.317.537.514.439.914.341.915.247.411.951.113.55712.165.512.466.511.770.111.874.511.477.212.376.112.276.712.178.112.28012.979.313.478.513.281.612.98213.682.513.479.313.26524.890.40.681.3median 12.9median 76.10.911.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 12SSamsung Galaxy A14 5G

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass – on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids – only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs – on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass – on average 33.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids – on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs – only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 39%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 26%, worst was 134%

While the Redmi Note 12S hardly requires any energy under low load, it can consume up to 8.6 watts under heavy load.

Once the battery is empty, it can be recharged with up to 33 watts. Fortunately, Xiaomi provides fast charging technology in the low price segment, meaning that the Redmi Note 12S is recharged in 1:45 hours when the battery is completely empty.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G96
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption

0%

4%

0%

2%

4%

Idle Minimum *

1

0.99

1%

0.8

20%

0.64

36%

0.945 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.89 – 1, n=2)

5%

0.883 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.12 – 2.37, n=173, last 2 years)

12%

Idle Average *

1.3

1.98

-52%

1.5

-15%

2.1

-62%

1.585 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.3 – 1.87, n=2)

-22%

1.493 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.69 – 4.26, n=173, last 2 years)

-15%

Idle Maximum *

1.5

2.02

-35%

2

-33%

2.17

-45%

1.7 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.5 – 1.9, n=2)

-13%

1.7 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.78 – 4.45, n=173, last 2 years)

-13%

Load Average *

5.8

3.35

42%

4.6

21%

3.73

36%

4.41 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3.01 – 5.8, n=2)

24%

4.49 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(2.1 – 10.1, n=173, last 2 years)

23%

Load Maximum *

8.6

4.72

45%

6.3

27%

5.44

37%

7.43 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(6.26 – 8.6, n=2)

14%

7.36 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3.56 – 13.7, n=173, last 2 years)

14%

* … smaller is better

We also tested the battery life in everyday use via various battery tests. The most important is our WLAN test, which simulates daily internet use. The smartphone lasts almost 16 hours and thus delivers a good result for the price segment. It lands in the midfield among similarly priced phones.

Almost 6 hours under load is also a good value in view of the possible high consumption rates, so the energy saving functions appear to do their job well.

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) 29h 56min
WiFi Websurfing 15h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p 17h 22min
Load (maximum brightness) 5h 56min

Pros

+ sturdy case

+ compact and light

+ bright AMOLED screen

+ long battery life

+ fast charging technology

+ lots of storage

Cons

– PWM flickering

– inaccurate localization

– system bogged with ads

– no 5G

In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S.
In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S.

Those looking for a somewhat compact smartphone with long runtimes and a great screen should have the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S on their radar.

The case isn’t very spectacular, the software ads are occasionally annoying and the speaker system is average. But the smartphone does offer good storage capacity, decent photo quality, flexible app options and fast charging.

In terms of performance, the smartphone is on par with its class, but you have to put up with occasional lag despite the fast storage. The AMOLED screen’s lack of DC dimming may be a dealbreaker for sensitive users, as it flickers strongly at low brightness.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S ranks as compact smartphone with lots of storage and a bright AMOLED screen.

Users who do not want to do without 5G and for whom the phone’s size is not the most important criterion can also get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is also compact, but you have to make do with much less storage space.

At Amazon USA, buyers can purchase a 256 GB variant of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S in Ice Blue ($219.50), Onyx Black ($217.00) or Pearl Green ($214.00).

Prices are as of 08.08.2023 and are subject to change.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
–
08/07/2023 v7

Florian Schmitt

Connectivity

46 / 70 → 66%

Games Performance

24 / 64 → 38%

Application Performance

69 / 86 → 81%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Florian Schmitt, 2023-08- 8 (Update: 2023-08- 8)

Read More

Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *