The AMD Radeon 680M is an integrated GPU in the Ryzen 6000 series for laptops (Rembrandt, e.g. Ryzen 9 6980HX). The iGPU is based on the RDNA2 architecture and has 12 CUs (=768 shaders) clocked at up to 2,400 MHz (depending on the CPU model). The 680M and 660M iGPUs are the first integrated graphics card with hardware raytracing support, although the performance is too slow to use it in current games.
Thanks to the new architecture, high core count and the increased maximum core clock, the Radeon 680M should be clearly faster then the old Radeon Vega 8 iGPUs. Therefore, the 680M should be the fastest integrated graphics card in early 2022. Compared to the dedicated Radeon 5300M (also RDNA), the 680M should still be significantly slower. According to AMD, the Radeon 680M (in the 6800U) is faster than a dedicated Nvidia GeForce MX450 and best suited for 1080p gaming and low details (for AAA games).
Thanks to the modern 6nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD), so the graphics card can also be used for slim and light notebooks (depending on the CPU model). The whole Ryzen 6000 chip can be configured down to 15W.
| CPU in Radeon 680M | GPU Base Speed | GPU Boost / Turbo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX | 8 x 3300 MHz, 45 W | ? MHz | 2400 MHz |
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H | 8 x 3300 MHz, 45 W | ? MHz | 2400 MHz |
| AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | 8 x 3300 MHz, 45 W | ? MHz | 2400 MHz |
| {element.style.display=’table-row’;});document.querySelectorAll(‘.gpu_integrated_link’).forEach(element=> {element.style.display=’none’;});return false;”>» show 13 more | |||
| min. – max. | ? MHz | 2200 – 2400 MHz | |
Benchmarks
Performance Rating – 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1546 avg: 2500 median: 2609 (8%) max: 2914 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1359 avg: 2232 median: 2323 (6%) max: 2607 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 313891 avg: 380240 median: 395496 (46%) max: 419088 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 141638 avg: 170450 median: 171432 (23%) max: 197300 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 22343 avg: 30131 median: 30802 (33%) max: 35309 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26269 avg: 41669 median: 43382 (11%) max: 50120 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3531 avg: 6090 median: 6287 (2%) max: 6993 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3791 avg: 6649 median: 6865 (8%) max: 7593 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 187031 avg: 241430 median: 239402 (31%) max: 310414 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 14403 avg: 15238 median: 15237.5 (8%) max: 16072 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 2476 avg: 3698 median: 3874 (4%) max: 4455 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6852 avg: 10071 median: 10382 (15%) max: 11523 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6969 avg: 10132 median: 10578 (9%) max: 11605 Points
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s153’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 31739 avg: 35856 median: 36494 (11%) max: 38288 Points
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s154’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 27530 avg: 31115 median: 32022 (18%) max: 33030 Points
3DMark 05 – 3DMark 05 – Standard
min: 44380 avg: 50994 median: 52483.5 (57%) max: 54628 Points
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb4_s16’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark 06 3DMark 06 – Standard 1280×1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 15792 avg: 32123 median: 35918.5 (50%) max: 37587 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 – Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 11.6 avg: 16.7 median: 17.1 (6%) max: 21 fps
Blender – Blender 3.3 Classroom HIP *
min: 302 avg: 348.6 median: 333 (27%) max: 555 Seconds
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb259_s751’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 sw-03
min: 72.1 avg: 94.5 median: 98.9 (27%) max: 108 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb259_s750’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 snx-02
min: 40.5 avg: 57.3 median: 61.5 (15%) max: 65.6 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb259_s749’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 showcase-01
min: 30.7 avg: 32.2 median: 32.2 (7%) max: 33.6 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb259_s748’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 19.6 avg: 40.6 median: 45.8 (13%) max: 51.3 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb259_s747’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 maya-04
min: 62.1 avg: 69.2 median: 70.8 (19%) max: 73.2 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb259_s746’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 energy-01
min: 3.91 avg: 39.8 median: 37.5 (33%) max: 80.4 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb259_s745’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 creo-01
min: 36.7 avg: 44.3 median: 44.6 (23%) max: 51.3 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb259_s744’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 catia-04
min: 48.7 avg: 68.1 median: 73.2 (14%) max: 77.3 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb259_s1102’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 77.7 avg: 85.4 median: 86.7 (15%) max: 90.4 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1676’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 sw-04
min: 71 avg: 96.1 median: 101 (31%) max: 106 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1674’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 snx-03
min: 40.2 avg: 96.8 median: 114 (16%) max: 124 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1672’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 showcase-02
min: 22.2 avg: 30.7 median: 31.9 (7%) max: 37.5 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1670’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 medical-02
min: 28.6 avg: 46.7 median: 47.5 (18%) max: 63.1 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1668’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 maya-05
min: 65.5 avg: 93.7 median: 100.2 (12%) max: 112 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1666’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 energy-02
min: 1.04 avg: 9.5 median: 10.4 (6%) max: 14.6 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1664’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 creo-02
min: 50.9 avg: 72.2 median: 77.8 (13%) max: 83.5 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1662’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 catia-05
min: 83 avg: 100.8 median: 100.5 (12%) max: 118 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1660’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 72.8 avg: 84 median: 85.5 (15%) max: 90.3 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2436’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>SPECviewperf 2020 v1 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 39.7 avg: 45.2 median: 45.2 (9%) max: 50.6 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2435’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 40.4 avg: 82.2 median: 82.2 (20%) max: 124 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2434’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 15.4 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (23%) max: 15.6 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2433’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 88.1 avg: 95.1 median: 95.1 (16%) max: 102 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2432’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 0.85 avg: 3.8 median: 3.8 (5%) max: 6.72 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2431’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 35.3 avg: 40.6 median: 40.6 (25%) max: 45.9 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2430’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 18.9 avg: 20 median: 20 (17%) max: 21 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2429’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 28.5 avg: 31.8 median: 31.8 (15%) max: 35 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2378’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 41.1 avg: 52.7 median: 57.4 (11%) max: 59.7 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2377’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 10.2 avg: 11.1 median: 11.1 (18%) max: 12.1 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2376’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 38.6 avg: 43.3 median: 43.9 (8%) max: 47.5 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2375’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 6.05 avg: 6.9 median: 6.7 (3%) max: 7.98 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2374’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 19.4 avg: 26.5 median: 29.1 (16%) max: 31 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2373’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 17.6 avg: 19.7 median: 20.3 (16%) max: 21.3 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2372’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 18.3 avg: 18.6 median: 18.4 (8%) max: 19.1 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb22_s38’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 – Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 11760 avg: 15474 median: 16593 (12%) max: 17565 points
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb62_s249’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 – Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 59.85 avg: 98.1 median: 109.4 (40%) max: 113.68 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s707’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 75.9 avg: 141.9 median: 147.9 (38%) max: 186.07 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s708’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.9 avg: 97.9 median: 97.9 (98%) max: 98 %
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 47.8 avg: 49.2 median: 49.2 (9%) max: 50.6 fps
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 120 avg: 120.6 median: 120.6 (9%) max: 121.1 fps
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 105.6 avg: 107.5 median: 107.5 (0%) max: 109.3 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 – Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6 avg: 166.1 median: 104.6 (3%) max: 289 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 – Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
Geekbench 6 – Geekbench 6.0 GPU OpenCL
min: 26957 avg: 28096 median: 28569 (9%) max: 28763 points
Geekbench 6 – Geekbench 6.0 GPU Vulkan
min: 29614 avg: 30620 median: 30845 (12%) max: 31401 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 676 avg: 1026 median: 735 (3%) max: 1958 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 800 avg: 1230 median: 1357 (2%) max: 1406 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 – ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 5294 avg: 6365 median: 6471 (7%) max: 7111 points
Power Consumption – Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption – external Monitor *
min: 38.8 avg: 56.7 median: 57.7 (8%) max: 80.2 Watt
Power Consumption – The Witcher 3 Power Consumption – external Monitor *
min: 39 avg: 52.8 median: 50.1 (7%) max: 74.7 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 40.1 avg: 53.4 median: 49.7 (11%) max: 69 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.2296 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (43%) max: 0.558 Points per Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency – external Monitor
min: 0.2466 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (42%) max: 0.575 Points per Watt
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
– Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920×1080
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Video Quality 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920×1080
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840×2160
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920×1080
Lowest Settings possible 1920×1080
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 30. 08:54:22
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 May 2023 11:14:12 +0200 +0.001s … 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.055s … 0.056s
#4 did output specs +0s … 0.056s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.056s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11124 +0.038s … 0.095s
#7 got single benchmarks 11124 +0.073s … 0.168s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.168s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.964s … 1.133s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s … 1.133s
#11 Got 1215 rows for game benchmarks. +0.211s … 1.344s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 1.344s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.157s … 1.501s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.458s … 3.959s
#15 return log +0.115s … 4.074s
Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon 680M graphics card
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 review – The almost perfect ultrabook with AMD Zen 3+
The Lenovo Yoga Pro 14 is a brand-new ultrabook available with either AMD or Intel CPUs and can even be configured with a dedicated Nvidia RTX 40 Series GPU. Th…
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | AMD Radeon 680M | 14.50″ | 1.5 kg
Beelink SER6 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS mini PC review: Now with integrated DisplayPort
Don’t be fooled by the fresh 7000 series name as this is very much a 6000 series processor. The Zen 3+ Ryzen 7 7735HS is still powerful especially when it comes…
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | AMD Radeon 680M | | 506 g
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD laptop review: Lightweight workstation without dGPU
Lenovo traditionally like to reuse their T series ThinkPad laptops as workstations. The ThinkPad P14s Gen 3, for example, is the ThinkPad T14 Gen 3’s counterpar…
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U | AMD Radeon 680M | 14.00″ | 1.5 kg
Morefine M600 desktop PC review: Modern mini PC with AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 32 GB DDR5 and USB4
The Morefine M600, which has an AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, is based on AMD’s up-to-date Rembrandt SoC. We took a closer look at the model and compared its performance …
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | AMD Radeon 680M | | 779 g
HP Dragonfly Pro laptop review: AMD Ryzen 7 7736U makes a splash
More luxurious than a Pavilion, thinner than an Envy, and more affordable than an EliteBook. The Dragonfly Pro skips out on wide configurable options and ports …
AMD Ryzen 7 7736U | AMD Radeon 680M | 14.00″ | 1.5 kg
GPD Win 4: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 6.00″, 0.6 kg
Review » GPD Win 4 handheld PC review: 1080p Ryzen 7 gaming in the palm of your hand
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
Review » Asus VivoBook S15 laptop review: iGPU provides performance boost
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (6900HX): AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.6 kg
Review » Minisforum Venus Series UM690 desktop review: small office PC with Ryzen 9 6900HX and USB4
Beelink SER6 Pro: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 0.5 kg
Review » Beelink SER6 Pro review: The AMD Radeon 680M is stunning on a mini PC
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 AMD laptop review: Quiet and efficient workhorse with Ryzen power
HP EliteBook 835 G9: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
Review » HP EliteBook 835 G9 review: Powerful business notebook with bright screen and great keyboard
HP EliteBook 865 G9: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 16.00″, 1.9 kg
Review » HP EliteBook 865 G9 Laptop review – 1000-nits Sure View display not quite up to par
Beelink GTR6: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.8 kg
Review » Beelink GTR6 Ryzen 9 6900HX mini PC review: Faster than most Intel NUCs
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 G1-21D20016GE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 G1 OLED Review – Business-Laptop with an AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6860Z
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Ryzen Pro
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 14 G7 review: Multimedia convertible shines with AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
Review » HP EliteBook 845 G9 in review: 35-watt AMD outclasses Lenovo & Dell
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 13.30″, 1.1 kg
Review » Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED laptop review: Subnotebook impresses with fast AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Review » AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Efficiency Review – Zen3+ beats Intel Alder Lake
Asus VivoBook S14 OLED M3402RA: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 OLED M3402RA
Acer TravelMate P4 TMP414-41-R923: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Acer TravelMate P4 TMP414-41-R923
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023: AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » HP Dragonfly Pro 2023
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6H6EA
Asus Vivobook S 16X M5602, R7 6800H: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 16.00″, 1.9 kg
External Review » Asus Vivobook S 16X M5602, R7 6800H
Asus ZenBook S 13 UM5302TA, R7 6800U: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 13.30″, 1.1 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook S 13 UM5302TA, R7 6800U
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE
Acer Swift Edge SFA16-41, Ryzen7 6850U: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 16.00″, 1.2 kg
External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFA16-41, Ryzen7 6850U
Lenovo Yoga 7 14ARB7-82QF000GGE: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 14ARB7-82QF000GGE
HP EliteBook 865 G9: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 16.00″, 1.9 kg
External Review » HP EliteBook 865 G9
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 G1-21D20016GE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 G1-21D20016GE
HP Elitebook 865 G9, Ryzen 9 Pro 6950: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, 16.00″, 1.7 kg
External Review » HP Elitebook 865 G9, Ryzen 9 Pro 6950
Acer Swift Edge SFA16-41-R8GY: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 16.00″, 1.2 kg
External Review » Acer Swift Edge SFA16-41-R8GY
HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6F5EA: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » HP EliteBook 845 G9 6F6F5EA
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, R7 6800H: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, R7 6800H
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D20029GE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D20029GE
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM5302T: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 13.30″
External Review » Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM5302T
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 13.30″, 1.1 kg
External Review » Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301RA-LJ011W: AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, 13.40″, 1.3 kg
External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301RA-LJ011W
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, 14.50″, 1.5 kg
» Lenovo’s new Yoga Pro 7 14 AMD offers an almost unbeatable value for money
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
» A question of sense: The Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD is pretty redundant
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (6900HX): AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.6 kg
» MINISFORUM Venus UM690: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX mini-PC drops below US$700 with RAM and storage in new money off deal
GPD Win 4: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 6.00″, 0.6 kg
» GPD Win 4 is fast, but it’s as loud as many gaming laptops
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023: AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
» AMD Ryzen 7 7736U integrated Radeon 680M achieves Playstation 4 level graphics, runs God of War, Horizon Zero Dawn, and Final Fantasy XV at 1080p30
Beelink GTR6: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.8 kg
» Beelink GTR6: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX mini-PC reduced by over US$200 in new deal
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
» Multimedia without dedicated GPU: Asus VivoBook S15 delivers great graphics performance
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
» Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 AMD: Currently probably the best ThinkPad laptop
HP EliteBook 835 G9: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
» HP EliteBook 835 G9: Powerful and durable thanks to Ryzen
HP EliteBook 865 G9: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, 16.00″, 1.9 kg
» HP’s 1000-nits Sure View panel is bright, but the picture quality is compromised
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
» The Lenovo Yoga 7 14 confirms AMD’s advantage in the mobile segment
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 13.30″, 1.1 kg
» The Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED cleary shows that AMD is the superior choice for compact laptops right now
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Reference Values: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 0.00″
» First AMD Ryzen 7 6800U benchmarks: Closer to Core i7-1260P in multi-core, Radeon 680M impresses in synthetics but lags in gaming
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM5302T: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, 13.30″
» First AMD Ryzen 7 6800U benchmarks: Closer to Core i7-1260P in multi-core, Radeon 680M impresses in synthetics but lags in gaming
