The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 for laptops (GN20-S7) is a fast mid-range gaming graphics card for laptops. The RTX 2050 is based on the modern Ampere GA107 chip (like the RTX 3050) which is manufactured on an 8nm Samsung process (8N). Compared to the similar GeForce MX570, the RTX2050 offers Raytracing and DLSS support.
Compared to the old Geforce RTX 2060 Mobile, the 2050 offers more shaders (2,048) but a greatly reduced memory bus (64 Bit). It is available in different versions with with TGPs ranging from 30 to 45 Watt. The maximum boost clock ranges from 1155 to 1477 MHz. It features up to 4 GB GDDR6 graphics memory (14 Gbps leading to 112 GB/s max throughput).
The gaming performance of the mobile RTX 2050 should be clearly lower than the RTX 2060 thanks to the greatly reduced graphics memory bus. First benchmarks position a fast version slightly above a GeForce GTX 1650 and on the same level of a GeForce MX570. However, games that support DLSS can offer clear performance advantages thanks to the Tensor cores.
Benchmarks
Performance Rating – 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
…
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
…
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1230 avg: 3449 median: 3719.5 (11%) max: 4326 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1072 avg: 3052 median: 3199 (9%) max: 3938 Points
…
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
…
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 23186 avg: 31399 median: 29043 (31%) max: 40781 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 47225 avg: 57769 median: 58445 (15%) max: 66365 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7428 avg: 8525 median: 8598.5 (3%) max: 9475 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 8755 avg: 9667 median: 9645.5 (11%) max: 10621 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 112270 avg: 132057 median: 132056 (17%) max: 151843 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 8064 avg: 8136 median: 8135.5 (9%) max: 8207 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 9246 avg: 12705 median: 12472 (18%) max: 15542 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10598 avg: 13027 median: 12340 (11%) max: 15411 Points
…
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
…
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s153’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. total
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s154’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
…
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
…
Blender – Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 130 avg: 138 median: 137.5 (20%) max: 147 Seconds
Blender – Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 78 avg: 82.5 median: 82.5 (31%) max: 87 Seconds
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s707’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 142.3 avg: 163.7 median: 157.7 (41%) max: 211 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s708’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb216_s641’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 – GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb216_s640’).forEach(element=> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 – GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
GFXBench 3.0 – GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
GFXBench 3.0 – GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
…
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
…
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
ComputeMark v2.1 – ComputeMark v2.1 Result
Power Consumption – Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption – external Monitor *
min: 49.4 avg: 66.3 median: 55.4 (8%) max: 91.6 Watt
Power Consumption – The Witcher 3 Power Consumption – external Monitor *
min: 48.1 avg: 64.7 median: 66.1 (9%) max: 79.4 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 49.3 avg: 69.3 median: 69.4 (15%) max: 85 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4614 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (48%) max: 0.545 Points per Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency – external Monitor
min: 0.4987 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (52%) max: 0.57 Points per Watt
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
– Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920×1080
Lowest Settings possible 1920×1080
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 29. 18:15:42
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 May 2023 11:14:12 +0200 +0.001s … 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.047s … 0.048s
#4 did output specs +0s … 0.048s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.048s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11108 +0.025s … 0.073s
#7 got single benchmarks 11108 +0.026s … 0.099s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.099s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.603s … 0.702s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.702s
#11 Got 356 rows for game benchmarks. +0.068s … 0.77s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.77s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.044s … 0.814s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.381s … 2.195s
#15 return log +0.085s … 2.28s
Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile graphics card
HP Envy 17 laptop review: GeForce GPU plays on elegant 4K display of the multimedia laptop
A large display with a high, 4K resolution in a simple case together with computing power from Intel’s 12th generation, 32 GB of DDR4 RAM, and a dedicated GeFor…
Intel Core i7-1255U | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 17.30″ | 2.6 kg
LG Gram 17 review – A super light 17-inch laptop with a modest dGPU
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050-equipped, 2022 LG Gram 17 weighs only 57 grams more than its counterpart – a device which comes without a dedicated graphics card. O…
Intel Core i7-1260P | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 17.00″ | 1.4 kg
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G laptop review: unused potential
On paper, the Aspire 5 A515-57G is a very interesting laptop. For instance, the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 is a rather uncommon graphics card. However, Acer messed…
Intel Core i5-1240P | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 15.60″ | 1.8 kg
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ review: Good multimedia laptop with a lot of power
Lenovo is offering a large 16-inch multimedia notebook in the ThinkBook 16 G4+, which is armed with a lot of power thanks to an Intel Core i7-12700H and a dedic…
Intel Core i7-12700H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 16.00″ | 1.8 kg
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 review: Multimedia laptop with RTX 2050
Honor is now aiming to offer much more performance with its new MagicBook 14, which combines the latest 45-watt Alder Lake H processor with a dedicated Nvidia G…
Intel Core i5-12500H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 14.00″ | 1.6 kg
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng: Intel Core i7-1255U, 17.30″, 2.6 kg
External Review » HP Envy 17-cr0079ng
HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0032TX: Intel Core i7-1255U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0032TX
HP Envy x360 15-ew0170nd: Intel Core i7-1255U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » HP Envy x360 15-ew0170nd
Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 14IAP7, i7-1260P RTX 2050: Intel Core i7-1260P, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 14IAP7, i7-1260P RTX 2050
HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0001nf: Intel Core i7-1255U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0001nf
Honor MagicBook 14 2022: Intel Core i5-12500H, 14.00″, 1.6 kg
External Review » Honor MagicBook 14 2022
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-705U: Intel Core i7-1260P, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-705U
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP: Intel Core i7-12700H, 16.00″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, i7 RTX 2050: Intel Core i7-12650H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, i7 RTX 2050
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng: Intel Core i7-1255U, 17.30″, 2.6 kg
» HP Envy 17 tested: A large multimedia laptop with GeForce RTX and 4K display
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G: Intel Core i7-1260P, 17.00″, 1.4 kg
» LG Gram 17 with an RTX 2050 – Maybe too light?
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, i7 RTX 2050: Intel Core i7-12650H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
» Xiaomi refreshes the RedmiBook Pro 15 2022 with a more powerful CPU and price reduction
