Strand-preferred base editing of organellar and nuclear genomes using CyDENT

Strand-preferred base editing of organellar and nuclear genomes using CyDENT
  • Boore, J. L. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 1767–1780 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tuppen, H. A., Blakely, E. L., Turnbull, D. M. & Taylor, R. W. Mitochondrial DNA mutations and human disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1797, 113–128 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Greaves, L. C., Reeve, A. K., Taylor, R. W. & Turnbull, D. M. Mitochondrial DNA and disease. J. Pathol. 226, 274–286 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR–Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 686–688 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420–424 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zong, Y. et al. Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 438–440 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, Q. et al. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 582–585 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yarnall, M. T. N. et al. Drag-and-drop genome insertion of large sequences without double-strand DNA cleavage using CRISPR-directed integrases. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 500–512 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, C. et al. Precise integration of large DNA sequences in plant genomes using PrimeRoot editors. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01769-w (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mok, B. Y. et al. A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing. Nature 583, 631–637 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, S., Lee, H., Baek, G. & Kim, J. S. Precision mitochondrial DNA editing with high-fidelity DddA-derived base editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 378–386 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kang, B. C. et al. Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA editing in plants. Nat. Plants 7, 899–905 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lei, Z. et al. Mitochondrial base editor induces substantial nuclear off-target mutations. Nature 606, 804–811 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cho, S. I. et al. Targeted A-to-G base editing in human mitochondrial DNA with programmable deaminases. Cell 185, 1764–1776 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yin, L., Shi, K. & Aihara, H. Structural basis of sequence-specific deamination by double-stranded DNA deaminase toxin DddA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-01034-3 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wah, D. A., Hirsch, J. A., Dorner, L. F., Schildkraut, I. & Aggarwal, A. K. Structure of the multimodular endonuclease FokI bound to DNA. Nature 388, 97–100 (1997).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bitinaite, J., Wah, D. A., Aggarwal, A. K. & Schildkraut, I. FokI dimerization is required for DNA cleavage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10570–10575 (1998).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miller, J. C. et al. An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 778–785 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szczepek, M. et al. Structure-based redesign of the dimerization interface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 786–793 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Waugh, D. S. & Sauer, R. T. Single amino acid substitutions uncouple the DNA binding and strand scission activities of Fok I endonuclease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9596–9600 (1993).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, B. I., Shannon, M., Stubbs, L. & Wilson, D. M. 3rd Expression specificity of the mouse exonuclease 1 (mExo1) gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 4114–4120 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Certo, M. T. et al. Coupling endonucleases with DNA end-processing enzymes to drive gene disruption. Nat. Methods 9, 973–975 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, M. J., Ma, S. M., Dumitrache, L. C. & Hasty, P. Biochemical and cellular characteristics of the 3′ → 5′ exonuclease TREX2. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 2682–2694 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zong, Y. et al. Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 950–953 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gehrke, J. M. et al. An APOBEC3A-Cas9 base editor with minimized bystander and off-target activities. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 977–982 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sanders, K. L., Catto, L. E., Bellamy, S. R. & Halford, S. E. Targeting individual subunits of the FokI restriction endonuclease to specific DNA strands. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 2105–2115 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, R. et al. High-efficiency plastome base-editing in rice with TAL cytosine deaminase. Mol. Plant 14, 1412–1414 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nakazato, I. et al. Targeted base editing in the plastid genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Plants 7, 906–913 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, Z., Yang, M., Zhang, Y., Jackson, A. O. & Li, D. In Encyclopedia of Virology 4th edn, Vol. 3 (eds Bamford, D. H. & Zickerman, M.) 420–429 (Academic Press, 2021).

  • Bonillo, M., Pfromm, J. & Fischer, M. D. Challenges to gene editing approaches in the retina. Klin. Monbl. Augenheilkd. 239, 275–283 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, J. et al. Discovery of deaminase functions by structure-based protein clustering. Cell 186, 3182–3195 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Christian, M. et al. Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics 186, 757–761 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, Y. et al. A library of TAL effector nucleases spanning the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 251–258 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nakazato, I. et al. Targeted base editing in the mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2121177119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mok, B. Y. et al. CRISPR-free base editors with enhanced activity and expanded targeting scope in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1378–1387 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mi, L. et al. DddA homolog search and engineering expand sequence compatibility of mitochondrial base editing. Nat. Commun. 14, 874 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shimura, M. et al. Development of Leigh syndrome with a high probability of cardiac manifestations in infantile-onset patients with m.14453G> A. Mitochondrion 63, 1–8 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wei, Y. et al. Mitochondrial base editor DdCBE causes substantial DNA off-target editing in nuclear genome of embryos. Cell Discov. 8, 27 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nishimasu, H. et al. Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 156, 935–949 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Richter, M. F. et al. Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 883–891 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yi, Z. et al. Strand-selective base editing of human mitochondrial DNA using mitoBEs. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01791-y (2023).

  • Shan, Q. et al. Rapid and efficient gene modification in rice and Brachypodium using TALENs. Mol. Plant 6, 1365–1368 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jin, S., Lin, Q., Gao, Q. & Gao, C. Optimized prime editing in monocot plants using PlantPegDesigner and engineered plant prime editors (ePPEs). Nat. Protoc. 18, 831–853 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, S. Ultrafast one‐pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp. iMeta 2, e107 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tarasov, A., Vilella, A. J., Cuppen, E., Nijman, I. J. & Prins, P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics 31, 2032–2034 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van der Auwera, G. A. et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 43, 11.10.1–11.10.33 (2013).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, 1–4 (2021).

  • Bae, S., Park, J. & Kim, J. S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics 30, 1473–1475 (2014).

  • Hu, J. et al. Strand-selective base editing of organellar and nuclear genomes with TALE fusions. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA957096 (2023).

  • Read More

    Share:

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *